Trade Show TalesBlog

Posts Tagged ‘labor’

Trade Show Material Handling and Labor Rate Survey

February 16th, 2023 COMMENTS

By Jessica Sibila, Executive Director, The Exhibitor Advocate

The Exhibitor Advocate recently published a 2022 Material Handling and Labor Rate Survey. The survey is an important benchmarking tool that provides industry stakeholders with cost comparisons of average labor and material handling rates across 16 major US cities. The survey was previously conducted by Trade Show Week and then EDPA through 2017. The key data findings in the survey show that exhibitor costs continue to rise. Installation and dismantle labor, electrical labor and material handling are outpacing inflation some by more than 30%.

To most of the industry, this isn’t surprising. We’ve been feeling these increases for a while. It just happens to be that now we have the data to confirm our suspicions. Every year, exhibitors have seen prices go up, and we get more and more creative on how to manage our costs. We work with our exhibit partners to try to figure out how to stretch every dollar. We compromise on our booth size, the products we choose to bring, and the way we promote or showcase our brand. I’ve sometimes heard stakeholders say, if exhibitors don’t want to pay the increasing fees, they should walk away from the show. But it’s not that easy. Trade shows are important to our business. There are interactions that happen here that are unparalleled. We support our associations, and we want to be part of the community that naturally occurs at these events.

Download the Survey (FREE)

There is more and more scrutiny on these events and the budgets that go along with them. Are we getting a ROI? Can we return from the show and explain the value of being there even if it was the intangibles that made it successful? Rising costs are an important part of the equation, not the whole equation. We must focus on the overall value. As costs go up, so too must value. Lately, we’ve seen rising costs outpace inflation and value. It’s why The Exhibitor Advocate exists. We started this non-profit trade association to amplify the voice of exhibitors. We’re not here to tell any stakeholder what they should charge. We are here to share pain points and data in an attempt to improve this important marketing channel. Labor and material handling rates are one of those areas. As an industry, we must look at these challenges and work together to find solutions to the value equation.

Having information available to the industry, like the Material Handling and Labor Rate Survey, is just the first step. As we all know, data is power. With this information, exhibitors can more accurately budget for upcoming shows and plan their participation accordingly. Show Managers can evaluate and compare their exhibitor rates to city averages. Facilities can utilize competitive exhibitor rates to attract shows to their destination. And so much more! Having the data is one step. Taking action is the next. This only works when we come together to address these issues and balance the value equation. Share this data with your network and support exhibitors in speaking up on what they need to be successful. If the exhibitor is successful, so too is the industry.

Download your copy of the 2022 Material Handling and Labor Rate Survey at www.ExhibitorAdvocacy.com.

Word on the Street — August 16th thru August 20th

August 22nd, 2010 1 COMMENT

Why we participate in the TS2 Show

Word on the Street by Kevin Carty

Perception vs. Reality

One of my best friends travels quite a bit for his job. We often joke about who travels more, but he has me beat by quite a distance.

Approximately 30-32 weeks a year, he’s on the road, and most of his travel is to Events, Conferences, and Trade Shows. These can range from a small regional show in Alaska where he has a table top display to the industry hardware show in Chicago where he has a 20′ x 50′ island exhibit.

He asked to meet this week to talk about their up and coming trade show program and to get some advice. They go to over 35 events or shows a year.

Without identifying the company, they are the nation’s largest provider of products in their market, selling to retailers like Wal-mart, Kroger, and Target, as well as most local and regional grocery chains.

Over the past two years, their ROI has dropped significantly; yet, their sales have continued to increase. They analyzed the problem and determined that the ROI shrinkage was directly related to increases in their event/show costs. In particular, costs associated with labor, show services, and drayage.

As he puts it, “We are at the point where we must decide between continuing to participate in large shows or hold private regional events in four or five cities a year. At the regional events, we would bring our customers in and show them our products and services.”

The numbers are staggering. Their sales have increased on average of 15 percent each year since 2008; yet it isn’t keeping pace with increases in their drayage, labor, and show services expenses.

And it was stunning to see the costs related to certain venues when compared side by side. For example, they compared a large show in Chicago vs. the same show in Orlando. Trust me I know the obvious reasons why some costs were lower, but overall the show services, labor, and drayage costs were 23 percent less in Orlando. And like all exhibitors, they do not determine the venue, so they have to decide whether to attend the show in Chicago.

He asked me my opinion about switching to large, privately-hosted, regional events. I have to be honest. I found myself recommending that they do just that. It gives them the same (if not better access to their clients), and they don’t have to deal with competitors.

Now, if you’re thinking,  “What about the perception of them not being at the shows?” I agree, there is a risk there, but for some companies, such as those with a large foothold or who are the market leader, not participating may not matter.

I know certain cities and venues are trying to “fix” the costs associated with attending shows, but do they realize how much needs to be fixed? There is a perception that trade shows are too expensive, and that perception, even as the industry makes changes, will continue to linger.

How can we go about changing that perception as large cities and venues work on the reality?

Please share you comments and stories. Be well!

–Kevin Carty

http://twitter.com/kevin_carty
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/kevin-carty/3/800/32a